The Supreme Court ruling with the 225, 2010, ruled that the marriage agreements governing the relations of matrimonial property must arise from a public act, otherwise they are not against third parties.
The grounds prepared by stoats is clear that " the marriage agreements should be concluded under penalty of nullity, with a public document that must provide evidence of procedural matrimonial property regime in accordance with art. 162 cod. Civ. both in the text previously in force for the reform of Law No. 151 of 1975 in what is currently in force which introduced the notation on the marriage in order to make them binding on third parties. It is not so exercised discipline in art. 213 cod. proc. Civ., given that the exercise of power of office to request information relating to government records and documents of the same that is necessary to acquire the process is optional at the discretion of the judge, whose failure shall be criticized in the review (despite a specific request to that effect made by the party), which deals not replace inquisitorial powers of the burden of proof on the party, with the result that such powers can be activated only when necessary to obtain information or documents relating to the PA that the party is unable to provide and which the administration is only in its possession which it has carried on the business. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment